• Gentile T
• Whetten A
• Alcantara Joel

• Adult
• Affiliation / Cornell University. Cornell Ornithology Lab
• Affiliation / International Chiropractic Pediatric Association
• Affiliation / Private Practice of Chiropractic
• Affiliation(G) / United States / Hawaii / Kamuela
• Affiliation(G) / United States / New York / Ithaca
• Affiliation(G) / United States / Pennsylvania / Media
• Cross-Sectional Studies
• Health Services Research
• Process Assessment, Health Care
• Students, Chiropractic
• Surveys and Questionnaires

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the interpersonal process of care (IPC) experience of patients receiving care at 1 chiropractic college.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, respondents attending care at the Sherman College of Chiropractic outpatient clinic completed a survey (July 2016 to June 2017) to provide their sociodemographic and clinical information and complete an adapted version of the IPC-18 to assess their IPC experience with chiropractic care. Principal component analysis and k-means cluster analysis determined natural groupings/clusters of respondents. Random forest modeling determined factors predictive of shared decision-making.

Results: Ninety-nine patients (41 males, 44 females, and 14 unknown) responded. The largest group of respondents was aged 40 to 55 years and highly educated. Principal component analysis found that the first dimension was strongly influenced by the IPC-18 subscale of communication (ie, elicited concerns, explained results, and decided together). The second dimension was strongly influenced by interpersonal style (ie, disrespectful office staff). The third and fourth dimensions were strongly influenced by communication (ie, lack of clarity) and interpersonal style (ie, discrimination due to race/ethnicity), respectively. The most important predictors for shared decision-making were communication (ie, chiropractor/intern explained the results of examination findings and elicited the patient’s concerns and took them seriously) and interpersonal style (ie, the patient was treated as an equal). Patient age and presenting symptoms were also important predictors of shared decision-making.

Conclusion: The IPC experience of patients under care was dominantly positive, cooperative, and equitable with their chiropractor/interns and office staff. Factors predictive of shared clinical decision-making included good communication and a positive interpersonal style with the provider.

Author Keywords: Process Assessment; Health Care; Health Services Research; Chiropractic

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher; full text is available by subscription. Online access only.