Objective: This paper examines one of the earliest and most consequential episodes of political division within the chiropractic profession: the failed 1905 chiropractic licensing effort in Minnesota.
Methods: Drawing upon historical sources and early chiropractic literature, the paper explores the conflict between D.D. Palmer and Solon M. Langworthy, whose competing visions for chiropractic education, philosophy, and professional regulation contributed to the defeat of what may have become the first chiropractic licensing law in the United States. Particular attention is given to the role of apprentice-trained practitioners in Minnesota, Langworthy’s progressive 2-year curriculum and the legislative campaign led by Daniel D. Riesland and Langworthy to establish a state board of chiropractic examiners.
Results: The paper further analyzes Palmer’s opposition to the legislation, his warnings against the creation of a monopolistic examining board and the broader implications of internal professional discord. Governor John A. Johnson’s eventual veto of the bill, influenced by both organized medicine and visible fractures within chiropractic ranks, is presented as a pivotal moment in the profession’s early history. The article argues that the political infighting and ideological factionalism that characterized chiropractic’s formative years continue to echo in contemporary debates between “traditional” and “evidence-friendly” chiropractors.
Conclusion: By revisiting the Minnesota licensing debacle, this paper highlights the enduring consequences of professional disunity and underscores the importance of historical awareness in shaping the future direction of chiropractic.
Author keywords: Chiropractic; Medical History
This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Click on the above link for free full text.
|
