For best results switch to Advanced Search. |
Article Detail |
Return to Search Results | ||||||||||||
ID | 22659 | ||||||||||||
Title | Research. Comparison of resting pulse rates in chiropractic students versus the general population | ||||||||||||
URL | http://www.tihcij.com/Articles/Comparison-of-Resting-Pulse-Rates-in-Chiropractic-Students-Versus-the-General-Population.aspx?id=0000379 | ||||||||||||
Journal | Top Integr Health Care. 2012 ;3(4):Online access only 6 p | ||||||||||||
Author(s) | |||||||||||||
Subject(s) | |||||||||||||
Peer Review | Yes | ||||||||||||
Publication Type | Article | ||||||||||||
Abstract/Notes | Introduction: Research typically shows that a lower resting pulse rate (RPR) is healthier than a higher RPR. Limited research on reduction of RPR following chiropractic care warrants further research. Accordingly, the present study compares RPRs between a small group of chiropractic student-patients and a similar group from the general population. Methods: RPR data from a convenience sample of 17 chiropractic students, who were also chiropractic patients (CSP), were compared to a reference group from the general population. Both groups consisted of young adult white males and were compared using a two sample t test and effect size. Results: The CSP group had a mean RPR of 65.2 BPM compared to the general population group whose mean RPR was 71 BPM, a difference that was statistically significant (p = 0.0097). A low-to-medium effect size (of 0.39) was observed for this difference as well. Conclusion: This group of chiropractic student-patients had a lower average resting pulse rate compared to their reference group. Further study with random sampling and an accounting of other potential confounders such as physical fitness is warranted. This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Click on the above link for free full text. Link to PDF version
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Text (Citation)
Tagged (Export)
Excel
|
|||||||||||||
|