| For best results switch to Advanced Search. |
Article Detail |
Return to Search Results | ||||||||||||
| ID | 23597 | ||||||||||||
| Title | A perspective on ionizing radiation exposure after the Japanese wake-up call - Part III: What about non-ionizing radiation? | ||||||||||||
| URL | |||||||||||||
| Journal | Nutr Perspect. 2014 Jul;37(3):11-12;14-20 | ||||||||||||
| Author(s) | |||||||||||||
| Subject(s) | |||||||||||||
| Peer Review | No | ||||||||||||
| Publication Type | Article | ||||||||||||
| Abstract/Notes | As I finished writing part II of this series, it was my intent to review in detail the risk of M 3 1 exposure from nuclear power plant accidents and optimal use of potassium iodide supplementation to mitigate its effects while keeping risks of side effects from potassium iodide supplementation at a minimum. H ow ever, as I continued to follow reports on radiation concerns, it became very obvious to me that I had completely neglected to mention another radiation issue that has been of great concern to many people in the US both before and after the tsunami-related disaster Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant on M arch 11 of this year. This concern relates to non-ionizing radiation, which has become ever more ubiquitous in our environment for several years now. If you are wondering why you have not heard more about this issue, I can assure you that you have heard much about this issue in the past and will hear much more about this issue in the future under the guise of another moniker, cell phone-induced radiation. This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the pubisher. Full text is available by subscription. The online version is available through CINAHL (EBSCO).
|
||||||||||||
| |
|||||||||||||
|
Text (Citation)
Tagged (Export)
Excel
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Follow us on: 
