• Ryan AT
• Too LS
• Bismark MM

• Affiliation / University of Melbourne. Melbourne Medical School. Department of Medical Education
• Affiliation / University of Melbourne. Melbourne School of Population and Global Health. Centre for Health Policy
• Affiliation(G) / Australia / Victoria / Melbourne
• Chiropractor-Patient Relations
• Chiropractors
• Employee Discipline
• General Practitioners
• Open Access Document
• Osteopathic Physicians
• Patient Satisfaction / statistics and numerical data
• Physical Therapists
• Risk Management

Background: Recent media reports have highlighted the risks to patients that may occur when practitioners in the chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professions provide services in an unethical or unsafe manner. Yet research on complaints about chiropractors, osteopaths, and physiotherapists is limited. Our aim was to understand differences in the frequency and nature of formal complaints about practitioners in these professions in order to inform improvements in professional regulation and education.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed all formal complaints about all registered chiropractors, osteopaths, and physiotherapists in Australia lodged with health regulators between 2011 and 2016. Based on initial assessments by regulators, complaints were classified into 11 complaint issues across three domains: performance, professional conduct, and health. Differences in complaint rate were assessed using incidence rate ratios. A multivariate negative binomial regression model was used to identify predictors of complaints among practitioners in these professions.

Results: Patients and their relatives were the most common source of complaints about chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists. Concerns about professional conduct accounted for more than half of the complaints about practitioners in these three professions. Regulatory outcome of complaints differed by profession. Male practitioners, those who were older than 65 years, and those who practised in metropolitan areas were at higher risk of complaint. The overall rate of complaints was higher for chiropractors than osteopaths and physiotherapists (29 vs. 10 vs. 5 complaints per 1000 practice years respectively, p < 0.001). Among chiropractors, 1% of practitioners received more than one complaint – they accounted for 36% of the complaints within their profession.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates differences in the frequency of complaints by source, issue and outcome across the chiropractic, osteopathic and physiotherapy professions. Independent of profession, male sex and older age were significant risk factors for complaint in these professions. Chiropractors were at higher risk of being the subject of a complaint to their practitioner board compared with osteopaths and physiotherapists. These findings may assist regulatory boards, professional associations and universities in developing programs that avert patient dissatisfaction and harm and reduce the burden of complaints on practitioners.

Author keywords: Complaints - Disciplinary action - Chiropractors - Osteopaths - Physiotherapists - Practitioners - Regulation - Risk regulation

Author affiliations:  ATR: Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; LST, MMB: Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher; click on the above link for free full text. PubMed Record