• Sousa Filho LF
• Barbosa Santos MM
• dos Santos GHF
• da Silva Júnior WM

• Acupuncture
• Affiliation / Universidade Federal de Sergipe. Graduate Program in Physical Education
• Affiliation(G) / Brazil / Sergipe / São Cristovão
• Dry Needling
• Injections, Intra-Articular
• Musculoskeletal Pain / therapy
• Open Access Document
• Review Literature as Topic
• Steroids / therapeutic use

Background: Corticosteroid injection and dry needling have been used in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, but it is unclear which intervention is the most effective. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of corticosteroid injection and dry needling for musculoskeletal conditions at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched up to 31 October 2021. Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of dry needling compared to corticosteroid injection in patients over 18 years with a musculoskeletal condition were included in the review. The studies had to report pain and/or disability as outcome. Risk of bias was assessed by using the revised Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB 2.0). Quality of evidence was evaluated by using the GRADE approach.

Results: Six studies were included (n = 384 participants). Four musculoskeletal conditions were investigated. There is very low-quality evidence that CSI is superior to DN for reducing heel pain (plantar fasciitis) and lateral elbow pain at short- and medium-term follow-up, but not for myofascial pain and greater trochanteric pain. There is very low-quality evidence that DN is more effective than CSI at long-term follow-up for reducing pain in people with plantar fasciitis and lateral epicondylitis. Very low-certainty evidence shows that there is no difference between DN and CSI for disability at short-term follow-up. One study showed that CSI is superior to DN at medium-term follow-up and another observed that DN is superior to CSI for reducing disability at long-term.

Conclusions: There are no differences between DN and CSI in pain or disability for myofascial pain and greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Very-low certainty evidence suggests that CSI is superior to DN at shorter follow-up periods, whereas DN seems to be more effective than CSI at longer follow-up durations for improving pain in plantar fasciitis and lateral epicondylitis. Large RCTs with higher methodological quality are needed in order to draw more incisive conclusions.

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020148650

Author keywords:  Pain—Disability—Steroids—Acupuncture—Manual therapy

Author affiliations: LFSF, WMdSJ: Graduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe,Brazil; 
LFSF, MMBS, GHFdS, WMdSJ: Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil
Corresponding author: Luis Fernando Sousa Filho—fernandosouf@hotmail.com

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher; click on the above link for free full text.  Online access only. PubMed Record | PDF