• Kongsted A
• Larsen AC
• Gregersen MHM
• Andersen TE
• Hoegh M
• Kjaer P
• Møller A
• Ravn SL
• Skou ST
• Hartvigsen J

• Affiliation / Aalborg University. Faculty of Medicine. Department of Health Science Technology
• Affiliation / Chiropractic Knowledge Hub (Denmark)
• Affiliation / University of Southern Denmark. Center for Muscle and Joint Health
• Back Pain
• Chronic Pain
• Musculoskeletal Pain
• Neck Pain
• Osteoarthritis
• Patient Education as Topic

Background: Patient education is considered a core aspect of health care, aimed at helping individuals understand and manage their conditions. However, no systematic overview across patient education approaches exists that can guide the optimization of educational strategies for musculoskeletal disorders.

Objectives: This scoping review aimed to map 1) recommendations provided about patient education in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), 2) research on the effectiveness of patient education, and 3) educational content recommended for chronic spinal pain, osteoarthritis, and mixed chronic primary musculoskeletal pain.

Methods: Following JBI guidance for scoping reviews, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO from January 2014 to July 2025 for systematic and scoping reviews, Delphi-studies, and consensus studies on patient education. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by pairs of reviewers. Findings were summarized within and across evidence types.

Results: Out of 4,243 unique records screened, 178 full-texts were assessed, and 66 papers included. CPGs consistently recommended patient education, and patients emphasized a need for individualization. Educational themes included helping people understand their condition and factors impacting pain, providing reassurance, and guiding management strategies. There was substantial uncertainty about the effectiveness of various types of patient education, and no reviews investigated individualized education.

Conclusions: Patient education is central in recommendations of care for musculoskeletal pain disorders, but effectiveness is uncertain, and no specific approach has been shown to be superior. We identified a gap between patient preferences for education individually tailored in a collaborative process and effectiveness studies focusing on pre-defined patient education programs.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-025-00614-y.

Author keywords: Back pain; Evidence gaps; Musculoskeletal pain; Neck pain; Osteoarthritis; Patient education; Patient preference; Practice guidelines.

This abstract is reproduced with the permission of the publisher; click on the above link for free full text. Online access only.